Newsome v. State

Newsome v. State, 199 So. 3d 510 (1DCA2016) AFFIRMED W/O PREJUDICE TO FILE 3.850 worked under Sichta Law Firm seeking reversal of conviction with understanding that the primary issue was not preserved due to trial counsel error. We argued in a manner that although resulted in an affirmance, did secure directions guiding Newsome in seeking 3.850 relief from ineffective assistance of trial counsel.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *